Next.js vs React – What are the Differences?

React.js and Next.js are two powerful tools in the world of JavaScript for building user interfaces, particularly web applications. While they share similarities, they also have distinct features and use cases. In this Next.js vs React blog, we will compare React.js and Next.js across various aspects to help you determine which one is the best fit for your next project.

1. Library vs. Framework

React.js (Library):

• Nature: React.js is a JavaScript library focused on building user interfaces.
• Purpose: It offers a declarative syntax for describing UI components and efficiently updates and renders them when the data changes.
• Flexibility: React.js provides a lot of freedom, allowing developers to choose their libraries for state management, routing, and other functionalities.

Next.js (Framework):

• Nature: Next.js is a React framework that adds additional features to streamline the development process.
• Purpose: It simplifies the setup for complex React applications by offering built-in solutions for common tasks like routing, server-side rendering, and static site generation.

2. Routing

React.js:

• Approach: Requires additional libraries or custom solutions for routing, such as React Router.
• Customization: While this offers flexibility, it requires extra setup and configuration.

Next.js:

• Built-in Routing: Next.js features file-system-based routing, which automatically maps files in the pages directory to routes in the application.
• Simplicity: This approach simplifies the creation and navigation of pages, reducing the boilerplate code.

3. Server-side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG)

React.js:

• Client-side Rendering: Primarily focuses on client-side rendering. Server-side rendering is possible but requires additional configuration and libraries like Next.js or custom solutions.
• Flexibility: Offers flexibility but at the cost of more setup and complexity.

Next.js:

• SSR and SSG Support: Provides built-in support for both SSR and SSG. This makes it a great choice for performance optimization and SEO.
• Automatic Handling: Next.js handles server-side rendering and static site generation out of the box, simplifying the development process.

4. API Routes

React.js:

• No Built-in Solution: Does not provide built-in solutions for serverless functions or API routes. Developers need to set up a separate backend or use libraries like Express.js.
• Flexibility: Offers flexibility but requires more effort to integrate.

Next.js:

• API Routes: Includes built-in API routes for creating serverless functions and handling backend logic within the Next.js project itself.
• Ease of Use: Simplifies the process of creating and managing backend functionalities.

5. Configuration

React.js:

• Manual Setup: Requires additional setup and configuration for features like server-side rendering and routing.
• Flexibility: Offers more control over configurations, which can be beneficial for complex or highly customized projects.

Next.js:

• Convention over Configuration: Adopts a convention-over-configuration approach, reducing the need for extensive setup.
• Simplicity: This makes it easier to get started and maintain the project.

6. Data Fetching

React.js:

• Custom Strategies: Leaves data fetching strategies up to the developer, typically done in lifecycle methods or using the useEffect hook.
• Flexibility: Offers flexibility but requires more effort to manage data fetching efficiently.

Next.js:

• Built-in Solutions: Provides data fetching methods like getServerSideProps and getStaticProps for server-side rendering and static site generation.
• Efficiency: These methods simplify data fetching and improve performance and SEO.

7. Ecosystem

React.js:

• Vast Ecosystem: Has a large ecosystem with numerous libraries and tools for various purposes.
• Community Support: Strong community support and extensive documentation.

Next.js:

• Extended Ecosystem: Builds on the React ecosystem and provides additional tools and features specific to its framework.
• Unified Experience: Offers a more integrated development experience with features built-in.

8. Use Cases

React.js:

• SPAs and Dynamic Web Apps: Suitable for building single-page applications (SPAs) and dynamic web applications.
• Flexibility: Ideal for projects where custom solutions are preferred.

Next.js:

• Static and Dynamic Sites: Ideal for building static websites, dynamic web applications, and projects that benefit from server-side rendering.
• Performance and SEO: Great choice for projects where performance and SEO are critical.

9. Conclusion

In summary, React.js is a powerful library for building user interfaces, offering flexibility and a vast ecosystem. Next.js, on the other hand, is a comprehensive framework built on React, providing built-in solutions for routing, server-side rendering, and static site generation. The choice between React.js and Next.js depends on your project requirements. If you need features like SSR and SSG out of the box or are building a web application with many pages, Next.js is a strong contender. For smaller projects or when you prefer more control over configurations, React.js might be more suitable.

picture source: udemy.com